May 19, 2012 12:12pm ? Comments

Yuval Levin has an absolutely brilliant piece in the new Weekly Standard. You should definitely read the whole thing. More important, the Romney campaign should definitely read the whole thing, and act on it.

May 18, 2012 4:45pm ? Comments
byTory Cooney Special to the Examiner

Worcestershire sauce, imported mustard, and cognac are not exactly the first three ingredients that one would instinctively associate with Cherokee cuisine.  However, they all feature in Elizabeth Warren’s recipe for “Crab with Tomato Mayonnaise Dressing” from Pow Wow Chow, a 1984 cookbook edited by her cousin and published by the Five Civilized Tribes Museum.

Recent media revelations explain the not-quite-native ingredients: a not-quite-native recipe that originated in Le Pavillon, a French restaurant in New York City.

While the dish was not developed by some Cherokee grandmother and passed down through the generations, it was enjoyed by the likes of Cole Porter and the Duke and Duchess of Windsor.  And that certainly counts for something — regarding the quality of the recipe if not Warren’s claims about her heritage.

So here is the recipe, as published in The Virgin Islands Daily News on August 22, 1979, first published by Breitbart.com.  

Make sure you prepare omelets in advance, chill, stuff, garnish, and serve two to a guest.  If desired, a tossed salad (as per the chef’s suggestion) and a touch of light-hearted cynicism would make an excellent side dish.  

Recommended for summer entertaining, particularly brunches with the mid-century New York elite, politicos and the media, who seem to find “Cold Omelets With Crab Meat” simply irresistible.

May 18, 2012 4:37pm ? Comments
byCharlie Spiering Commentary Staff Writer
Follow on Twitter:

Mitt Romney

 

Romneys contribute $150k to campaign, other committees

 

Romney thanks George W. Bush for endorsement

 

Romney laments stimulus with 'bridge to nowhere' in backdrop

 

Romney castigates California

 

NC state rep apologizes for Mormon marriage comment

 

President Obama

 

Gallup: Young Voters Prefer Obama; Senior Citizens Go for Romney

 

Flashback: Obama admitted to drunk driving, too

 

Obama campaign focusing on education in new ad

 

Obama Camp Arms Voters With Information on Strict, New Voting Laws

 

Obama email: Defend Obama from Jeremiah Wright ads

 

Veepstakes

 

Meet the Rubios

 

Vice President Biden

 

Biden 'doesn't blame' voters for supporting inmate

 

May 18, 2012 4:09pm ? Comments
byJoel Gehrke Commentary Staff Writer
Follow on Twitter:

U.S. Senate candidiate Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., submitted recipes to a cookbook that purported to collect Native American recipes, but her some of her submissions appear to be plagiarized, according to a new report.

It's the kind of story that -- in addition to the dubious claims about Warren's Cherokee ancestry -- threaten to turn her campaign into a punch line. Breitbart News reports that two recipes were published in the New York Times in 1979, and apparently originated at the famous French restaurant in Manhattan, Le Pavillon:

Ms. Warren’s 1984 recipe for Crab with Tomato Mayonnaise Dressing  is a word-for-word copy of Mr. Franey’s 1979 recipe.

Mrs. Warren’s 1984 recipe for Cold Omelets with Crab Meat contains all four of the ingredients listed in Mr. Franey’s 1979 recipe in the exact same portion but lists five additional ingredients. More significantly, her instructions are virtually a word for word copy of Mr. Franey’s instructions from this 1979 article.

Le Pavillon operated from 1941-1971. The Franey-Warren recipes were reportedly favorites of Cole Porter and the Duke and Duchess of Windsor.

A blog dedicated to the cultural history of New York City notes that a dinner at Le Pavillon in April 1946 cost about $6 -- that's $70.80 in today's dollars, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics inflation calculator -- per a story printed in the April 1946 edition of Gourmet Magazine.

As late as 1965, the restaurant was a favorite of the Kennedy family. "Some institutions complement each other beautifully, and that's the way it is with the Kennedy family and France's foremost gift to American gastronomy, Henri Soule," wrote The New York Times' Craig Claiborne in October of that year. "Twice over the weekend the family chose his elegant and august Pavillon restaurant as a point of farewell feasting for the departing French Ambassador, Herve Alphand, and his wife."

A fancy French restaurant in Manhattan frequented by British royalty and American political and cultural icons -- as pedigrees go, that's about as far from 'passed down by generations of persecuted Native American grandmothers' as it gets.

 

 

May 18, 2012 3:53pm ? Comments
byCharlie Spiering Commentary Staff Writer
Follow on Twitter:

The Obama campaign is pretty proud of the President's Avengers knowledge, tweeting out a video clip today featuring Obama discussing the Avengers during an interview on The View.

In the video clip, President Obama was asked if he knew three of the five names of the Avengers.

"I just saw the Avengers so this is easy, you've got the Hulk, Captain America, Iron Man." Obama replied, and added, "I'm doing pretty good!"

 

 

May 18, 2012 2:32pm ? Comments
byJoel Gehrke Commentary Staff Writer
Follow on Twitter:

The Chinese government is increasingly lauching cyber attacks against the United States Defense Department  (DOD) for intelligence purposes, according to a new government report on the Chinese military.

"I think we have concerns about a number of computer network operations and activities that appear to originate from China that affect DOD networks," David Helvey, acting assistant Secretary of Defense for East Asia told reporters today.

"China’s persistent cyber intrusions indicates the likelihood that Beijing is using cyber network operations (CNOs) as a tool to collect strategic intelligence," Defense Department added in its 2012 report to Congress on Military and Security Developments involving the People's Republic of China.

Helvey chose not to specify, in the briefing, who was behind the attacks, but he said the United States is concerned about China's cyber war investments.

"We note that China's investing in not only capabilities to better defend their networks but also they're looking at ways to use cyber for offensive operations," he said. "There is the potential for these types of operations to be very disruptive, disruptive not only in a conflict, could be very disruptive to the United States, but other countries as well."

 

May 18, 2012 2:03pm ? Comments
byJoel Gehrke Commentary Staff Writer
Follow on Twitter:

House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, and House party leadership confronted Attorney General Eric Holder for not cooperating with the investigation into Operation Fast and Furious in a letter today.

The letter -- signed by Boehner, House Majority Leader Eric Cantor, R-Va., and House Majority Whip Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., and House Oversight and Government Reform Committee chair Darrell Issa, R-Calif., -- increases the likelihood that House Republicans will pursue contempt charges against Holder if he does not turn over documents pertaining to the gunwalking scheme.

"As co-equal branches of the U.S. Government, the relationship between the Legislative and Executive branches must be predicated on honest communications and cannot be clouded by allegations of obstruction," the House leaders wrote.  "If necessary, the House will act to fulfill our Constitutional obligations in the coming weeks."

Boehner demanded that Holder reveal who planned Operation Fast and Furious, which resulted in the death of Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry, who was shot by a drug smuggler armed with an assault rifle purchased through Fast and Furious.

"[T]wo key questions remain unanswered: first, who on your leadership team was informed of the reckless tactics used in Fast & Furious prior to Agent Terry’s murder; and, second, did your leadership team mislead or misinform Congress in response to a Congressional subpoena?" they asked Holder.

The Department of Justice maintains that Holder  "extraordinary lengths . . .to respond to the Committee’s requests."

May 18, 2012 1:57pm ? Comments
byCharlie Spiering Commentary Staff Writer
Follow on Twitter:

Vice President Biden said he doesn't blame West Virginia voters for voting for Texas inmate Keith Judd in the Democratic primary instead of President Obama.

After a local reporter from WTOV-TV, asked Biden about the embarassing vote, Biden answered that voters have "been through hell" with heavy unemployment and a loss in jobs from the "God-awful recession."

"I don't blame people. They're frustrated. They're angry," he concluded.

Judd won 41 percent of the Democratic vote in West Virginia in the primary that was held on May 8.

May 18, 2012 1:33pm ? Comments
byJoel Gehrke Commentary Staff Writer
Follow on Twitter:

Chuck Todd of NBC News said that Mitt Romney is trying to "bully" President Obama and the media into avoiding any discussion of Mormonism this campaign season.

"I think you can get away with that and he can sort of bully opponents and the media to not touch the religion issue," Todd said of Romney last night on MSNBC's Hardball with Chris Matthews. "I think Bain's another story."

Todd and National Journal's Major Garrett were opining that Romney, by denouncing Obama for "character assassination," was trying to preempt attacks on his Mormonism and his record at Bain Capital.

Depictions of Romney as a "bully" took centerstage in the campaign last week, when The Washington Post followed Obama's declaration of support on gay marriage by running a story alleging that Romney had forcibly cut the hair of a potentially gay classmate in high school.

May 18, 2012 1:20pm ? Comments
byCharlie Spiering Commentary Staff Writer
Follow on Twitter:
In this image provided by Facebook, Facebook founder, Chairman and CEO Mark Zuckerberg, center, rings the opening bell of the Nasdaq stock market, Friday, May 18, 2012,(AP Photo/Nasdaq via Facebook, Zef Nikolla)

Facebook has long had the image of a liberal California Silicon Vally company, but its Political Action Committee formed last September has donated more money to Republicans than Democrats.

According to FEC records, the PAC has donated $53,500 to Democrats, largely California Democrats including Nancy Pelosi and Diane Feinstein. Sens. Chuck Schumer, Claire McCaskill, and Harry Reid also received money from the PAC in early 2012.

But Republicans have gained the most money from Facebook, a total of $70,500, which includes conservative Senators Mike Lee, Pat Toomey, and Jim DeMint. Congressional leaders such as Senator Mitch McConnell, Speaker John Boehner, and Majority leader Eric Cantor have also received donations from the PAC.

Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg has personally given the Facebook PAC $10,000 since its creation.

Facebook COO Sheryl Sandberg, however, is a wealthy Obama supporter and has donated $64,000 to the Obama Victory Fund this cycle, according to FEC records. Sandberg also hosted a fundraiser for the president last September.

 

 

May 18, 2012 1:12pm ? Comments
byMark Tapscott Executive Editor

A tough-minded version of congressional oversight not seen on Capitol Hill since the days of the legendary Jack Brooks may be back if a May 10 letter from House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Darrel Issa and Subcommittee Chairman Jim Jordan to Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Lisa Jackson is any indication.

Brooks was the ornery, cigar-chomping Texas Democrat who chaired the Issa panel (known then as the House Committee on Government Operations) between 1975 and 1988. He tolerated no fools among those testifying before his committee and woe to the bureaucrat called on the Brooks carpet for wasting tax dollars. He was also among the architects of the Inspector General Act of 1978.

But aggressive oversight faded in the years after Brooks left that committee, especially between 2001 and 2006 when Republicans controlled the White House and Congress.

Issa has become a major figure since taking over as chairman of the oversight panel following the Republicans regaining the House majority in 2010, especially as a result of his dogged pursuit of the facts behind the Operation Fast and Furious scandal.

The letter to EPA, however, could indicate an important new direction in the Issa panel's approach to oversight. Where the Fast and Furious probe has focused mainly on determining who did what and when in the Justice Department's gun-walking weapons to Mexican drug cartels, the EPA letter seems targeted on preventing the agency from expanding its regulatory authority far beyond the clear intent of Congress.

The issue concerns EPA's assertion of authority under Section 404(C) of the Clean Water Act to retrospectively or retroactively deny permits issued by the Army Corps of Engineers for projects such as mineral mining in Alaska and coal mining in West Virgina.

In their letter, Issa and Jordan note that last month a federal district court ruled EPA was exceeding its authority, saying:

"EPA's position is that section 404( c) grants it plenary authority to unilaterally modify or revoke a permit that has been duly issued by the Corps - the only permitting agency identified in the statute - and to do so at any time.

"This is a stunning power for an agency to arrogate to itself when there is absolutely no mention of it in the statute. It is not conferred by section 404( c), and it is contrary to the language, structure, and legislative history of section 404 as a whole."

So, Issa and Jordan are requesting that Jackson provide documentation of the entire process by which her agency concluded that it could act on its controversial interpretation of Section 404(C), including an explanation of "the basis for EPA's claim that it has the legal authority under Section 404(c) of the Clean Water Act to block a permit even before the permitting process begins. Your answer should identify all prior precedents that EPA has relied on in drawing its legal conclusions."

Issa and Jordan also demand lists of every individual outside the agency that participated in, advised or was otherwise involved in the deliberations that led up to the decision to assert the questionable 404(C) authority.

It appears that Issa and Jordan intend to open to public examination the closed doors behind which EPA officials decided to assert a regulatory power for which it seems likely it possessed no authority from Congress. 

Documents elucidating such a process are typically not available to the public or the media via the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), which includes a "pre-decisional deliberations" exemption agency officials throughout the government routinely use to avoid having to explain how they reached a decision.

If Issa and Jordan re-establish the principle that Congress can and should actively pursue its undoubted oversight authority into every aspect of an executive branch policy, program or action, it could arrest and then reverse the headlong expansion of bureaucratic power that has marked federal operations since the New Deal.

Keep an eye on this one.

 

May 18, 2012 12:35pm ? Comments
byCharlie Spiering Commentary Staff Writer
Follow on Twitter:

Irish rock star Bono of U2 addressed a group of leaders today to promote further investment into Africa reminding them that "very few countries" had fulfilled their promises of financial aid.

Bono added that it was a tough sell to get countries to continue supporting Africa especially in difficult financial times

"Has anyone been to Europe lately?" asked Bono with a smile. "Is it still there?"

"I'm a European, I'm a proud European I believe in the EU, he added. "Most people call us the IOU."

"When the One campaign and I go busking for development assistance in this capital and the capitals of Europe in some quarters the word aid sounds like an expletive," Bono joked, "Really, It's like you brought a bad smell in to the room. It's like wow, that guy's got body odor."

He praised British Prime Minister David Cameron, asking the audience to recognize his efforts on behalf of Africa.

"If you see David Cameron enjoying an austerity pint at the bar beer shake his hand." Bono said, adding that the British Prime Minster would probably be drinking a gin and tonic.

"We're counting on Germany, we need France, we need Spain, and lets just face it, a world without Italy would just be boring." he continued, as the group laughed

"Thank God he's gone." Bono added, apparently referring to former Italian prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi.

 

May 18, 2012 12:10pm ? Comments
byJoel Gehrke Commentary Staff Writer
Follow on Twitter:

One North Carolina Democrat tried to interpret the state's support for traditional marriage as a negative for Mitt Romney, by arguing that conservative voters won't support a candidate whose faith allows for "multiple wives."

"If they look at that awful ballot amendment, and they compare that with his faith, I don't think people will be OK with it," said state Rep. Alma Adams, D-N.C., who heads the Legislative Black Caucus."From what I understand about the Mormon faith you can have multiple wives,"

Adams' analysis inverts the conventional wisdom about the gay marriage issue -- Obama, who supports gay marriage, risks losing support among black Democratic voters who overwhelmingly oppose gay marriage. And Romney, who supports traditional marriage, stands to gain politically in the swing-state of North Carolina, which went for Obama in 2008 but passed a ballot intitiative defining marriage as between one man and one woman last week.

The Mormon Church officially prohibited polygamy in 1890, after approving of the practice in its early years.

Romney has been attacked for changing political positions, but his commitment to his family has been perceived as a bulwark against criticisms of his integrity. Adams tried to use Mormonism to undermine that defense.

"That's sort of a contradiction," she said after mentioning her understanding of Mormonism and polygamy. "There are questions about who Romney is and what he believes in terms of that particular issue."

In February, Frank Rich predicted that Democrats would make a political issue of Romney's Mormonism, which Christopher Hitchens described as "weird and sinister."

The North Carolina Democratic Party faces its own sex scandal, though. A state party official has been accused of sexual harassment, and the state party reportedly paid to keep the charges under wraps in order to avoid embarrassment for the party.

President Obama's plan to solidify his grip on North Carolina by hosting the Democratic National Convention in Charlotte, N.C., also appears to be backfiring.

"Voters just approved a state constitutional amendment to ban gay marriage, which conflicts with Obama’s view on the issue," Bloomberg notes. "Convention fundraising has been slow, and labor unions tapped to fill the financial gap are angry the convention will be in a city -- Charlotte -- with no unionized hotels and in a state where compulsory union membership or the payment of dues is prohibited as an employment condition."

May 18, 2012 11:37am ? Comments
byConn Carroll Senior Editorial Writer
Follow on Twitter:

Free Press, a nonprofit advocacy group supposedly dedicated to promoting a "independent media ownership," has posted a letter attacking Sen. Jim DeMint, R-S.C., and Rep. Doug Lamborn, R-Colo., for their efforts to end taxpayer funding of Public Broadcasting. According to Free Press' Josh Stearns, the $445 million that the Corporation for Public Broadcasting gets each year is a "tiny federal investment" that "is vital to helping support programming that commercial media won’t showcase and provides an important foundation for stations around the country to build on."

But as a new Cato report due out next Monday details, not only did Public Broadcasting thrive long before the federal government started funding it, the whole reason President Lyndon Johnson created the CPB was to exert more government control over previously independent media.

In his new report titled, "If You Love Something, Set It Free: A Case for Defunding Public Broadcasting," Trevor Burrus writes:

Public broadcasting in America has never been divorced from government control and, realistically, it never will be. In fact, as will be discussed below, the CPB was created partially to enable government to better control the content of predecessor noncommercial stations that were thought to be broadcasting radical programming. From the beginning, the desire to control the content of broad- casts was evident. For example, although the Carnegie Commission report recommended a 12-person board, with six appointed by the president and six appointed by those appointees, President Johnson submitted a bill that had the president appointing every member of a 15-person CPB board. From the outset, public broadcasting was politicized.

Turns out, noncommercial broadcasting existed for decades before the federal government got involved:

In 1914 University of Wisconsin engineering professor Edward Bennett set up a personal wireless transmitter and applied to the Commerce Department for a license. Eight years later the station debuted its first news program. Today, Wisconsin Public Radio consists of 30 stations through- out the state.
...
In 1952 the Fund for Adult Education, a subsidiary of the liberal Ford Foundation, created the National Educational Television and Radio Center. Although originally not involved in the production of programming, by 1954 the center was producing limited amounts of programming and distributing it to local affiliates via mail.
...
By 1963 the privately funded National Educational Television and Radio Center began to focus completely on television, changing its name to National Educational Television (NET). The Ford Foundation invested large sums of money in educational television—at its peak nearly $100 million a year—and the foundation moved strongly to dominate the noncommercial television market. NET’s private backing enabled it to take a strong stance against taxpayer financing. To NET, public interest broadcasting consisted of programming that challenged the establishment by showing citizens the true face of poverty, war, race relations, and other controversial topics.

But all that independence ended up once the federal government started footing the bill:

NET’s controversial documentaries and hard-hitting exposees—like Who Invited U.S.?, The Poor Pay More, Black Like Me, and Inside North Vietnam—while raising the ire of many, did not create recriminations against public officials, organizational penance, or citizen backlash. As public fund- ing increased, however, the need for political savvy increased. Eventually, NET’s controversial programming helped contribute to its downfall. NET’s perceived “anti-administration” broadcasts helped spur the creation of CPB itself, which then supplanted NET, thanks largely to its government funding and its “playing ball” with its government sponsors.

Burrus concludes:

Public broadcasting does not need to go away, it needs to be transformed back into the noncommercial model that thrived before widespread government funding. CPB, PBS, NPR, as well as local public broadcasting out- lets such as Wisconsin Public Radio and Television, have the infrastructure and funding to become successful noncommercial, nonprofit broadcasters not tied to public funds.

May 18, 2012 11:32am ? Comments
byCharlie Spiering Commentary Staff Writer
Follow on Twitter:

Anti-abortion protesters interrupted HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius' commencement speech at Georgetown University this morning. After the protesters were forced out by security, Sebelius continued her speech to heavy applause from the audience.

Catholic and ant-abortion groups campaigned against Georgetown for choosing Sebelius as a commencement speaker after she issued the HHS contraception mandate. The Archdiocese of Washington also issued a statement criticizing the University.