February 3, 2012 9:02pm ? Comments
byDavid Freddoso Online Opinion Editor
Follow on Twitter:

You'd be wise to keep a cool head if you're going to CPAC. From the D.C. AFL-CIO:

Metropolitan Washington Council, AFL-CIO)With workshops like “Return of Big Labor: What Can We Learn from Wisconsin & Ohio,” and “Taking back Wall Street: The Tea Party vs. Occupy Wall Street,” the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) descends on the nation’s capital February 9-11 and local labor activists are planning a DC lesson to ensure that the voice of the 99% are heard at this elite conservative gathering. Actions are currently being planned for noontime and after work on Friday, February 10. Featured speakers at CPAC include Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker, and presidential candidates Mitt Romney, Newt Gingrich, and Rick Santorum.

You may remember what the union-aided Occupiers managed to do at the D.C. conference center in November. When conservatives staged a conference there, they banged on the windows, physically harmed at least one old woman, blocked local traffic, and used children as human shields. Much of the action was caught on tape.

The AFL-CIO is planning a disruption of some sort at noon Friday and another at 5 p.m. Here are some details about the event that AFL-CIO plans for noon:

Where
Marriott Wardman Park Hotel (2600 Woodley Rd at Connecticut Ave NW)

When
Feb 10   12:00 pm - 1:00 pm

What do Wisconsin Governor SCOTT WALKER, presidential candidates MITT ROMNEY, NEWT GINGRICH, RICK SANTORUM and House Budget Committee Chair PAUL RYAN have in common?

They all represent the greed of the wealthy 1% and they’ll all be at the 2012 Conservative Political Action Conference.

WE’VE HEARD ENOUGH FROM THE 1%!
Join the rally featuring tents, an inflatable fat cat, puppets, “candidate Walmart,” and more to
LET THE VOICES OF THE 99% BE HEARD!

Friday, February 10, at the Marriott Wardman Park Hotel (2600 Woodley Rd at Connecticut Ave NW), by the Woodley Park Metro Station

Coordinated by the Metro Washington Council AFL-CIO

February 3, 2012 7:40pm ? Comments
byJoel Gehrke Commentary Staff Writer
Follow on Twitter:

United States Armed Forces could win simultaneous conflicts in the Korean peninsula and against Iran, Defense Secretary Leon Panetta told American soldiers in Germany today, despite the impending force reductions.

"We could be fighting a land war in Korea, and suddenly Iran moves to close the Straits of Hormuz," Panetta said, discussing a hypothetical scenario, during a visit to soldiers at Landstuhl Regional Medical Center today. "We’ve got to have the capability to be able to confront each adversary, to not only deter them, but defeat them.  And we can do that with the force that we’ve put in place."

North Korea, currently transitioning from one dictator to another and armed with nuclear weapons, has concerned United States foreign policy analysts for decades. Similarly, Iran's push to develop nuclear weapons has resulted in oil sanctins and the possibility of an Israeli strike on Iranian nuclear facilities.

Panetta assured the troops that the United States could defeat two such enemies, but the scheduled force reductions will preclude fighting a two-front war on the scale of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. "If we are engaged in a major combat operation in one theater, we will have the force necessary to confront an additional aggressor by denying its objectives or imposing unacceptable costs," Panetta explained in a recent summary of Defense Budget Priorities and Choices.

 

February 3, 2012 6:19pm ? Comments
Follow on Twitter:
Sharron Angle, the Tea Party sweetheart who narrowly lost her 2010 bid to unseat Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid in Nevada has come out for Rick Santorum.  On Thursday, the Santorum campaign issued a statement from Angle heaping praise on their candidate:

"Rick Santorum and I have known each other for years. He is a strong fiscal and social conservative who stands on principles above politics. He has never wavered in his support for family values understanding the impact that strong families have on a prosperous economy. His continuous opposition to Amnesty, Obamacare, the bail-outs, and cap and trade are a perfect fit with our main street Tea Party movement."

Nevada's political playing field seems ripe for a surprise.  A small number of committed activists can make a difference in this contest. 

Conventional Wisdom - built on his strong showing in Nevada in 2008 - holds that Nevada Mormons will turn out in force for their co-religionist Mitt Romney, but that's based on a relatively fine slice of the overall Nevada GOP electorate.  Estimates based on Church of Latter Day Saints figures and census data indicate that Mormons make up less than 7% of Silver State population.

Ron Paul is targeting Nevada as one of the caucus states where he hopes to harness his sometimes small - he was polling last, at 7% statewide - but famously enthused support base to rack up enough delegates to make a stink at the convention in Tampa, but he expects to post much higher on Saturday.  Some of Paul's folks are veterans of their 2008 "outmaneuvering" of Republican regulars to maximize delegate accrual.  They know the arcane caucus rules inside out.  Four years ago, Nevada hosted one of Paul's only two county-wide wins.

So, if Angle can rile up some of her Silver State Tea Party pals, still loyal after her Nevada GOP establishment primary upset and Harry Reid near miss in '08, her nod may have an impact on the results, and maybe the course of the race.  Just a fraction of the some 70,000 2010 GOP primary voters she won over could be key.

Post-Florida primary, Santorum suggested that Newt Gingrich has blown his chance - yet again - as to be the conservative alternative to Romney, and that it was his turn to take up that mantle - again? - from that point on. 

If Politico's headline is right - "Newt Gingrich's Nevada campaign unraveling" - Santorum has a chance to best Newt in Nevada.  The question is: will Sharron Angle's endorsement influence enough activists to show up and caucus on a Saturday afternoon to surprise pundits in this expected snoozer?




February 3, 2012 5:23pm ? Comments
byPhilip Klein Senior Editorial Writer
Follow on Twitter:

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid has said he would not bring a budget to the floor for a vote this year, the Hill reports, which would make this the third straight year without such a resolution.

"We do not need to bring a budget to the floor this year — it's done, we don't need to do it," Reid said.

Though Senate Budget Committee Chairman Rep. Kent Conrad, D-N.D., said he expects his committee to produce a budget document, Reid said he wouldn't bring it to the floor.

His argument is that last summer's debt ceiling deal already set the spending levels for the year, so there's no need to pass a resolution that is non-binding anyway. Money is typically spent during the year through the appropriations process.

The problem with this explanation is that Democrats have spent a year trashing the House-passed budget authored by Rep. Paul Ryan, R-Wis. as balancing the budget on the backs of the poor, and have called for a more balanced approach. Yet neither President Obama nor the Democratic Senate has put on paper a budget that accomplishes the same ends through different means.

In a document that was scored by the CBO, Ryan showed that lawmakers could balance the budget and put the nation on a sustainable fiscal course without raising taxes. Obama and Democrats have said they supported a "balanced approach" that would include a combination of tax hikes and spending cuts. But beyond speeches, they have not released an actual detailed plan that can be evaluated by the CBO to produce the same budgetary savings as Ryan's plan does.

As I wrote in my column yesterday, when Obama releases his budget a week from Monday, it will be his last chance to live up to his promise of wanting to be the type of leader that made tough choices.

February 3, 2012 4:44pm ? Comments
byCharlie Spiering Commentary Staff Writer
Follow on Twitter:

Mitt Romney:

 

Mitt Romney cruising toward solid win in Nevada

 

Romney: Obama's policies have prevented a true economic recovery

 

Romney Op-ed: President Obama versus religious liberty

 

Newt Gingrich:

 

Newt Gingrich's Nevada campaign unraveling

 

Newt: Romney is 'George Soros approved' candidate

 

Casino mogul backing Newt Gingrich plays his own game

 

Ron Paul:

 

Paul: States should resolve land management issues

 

Ron Paul Finds Wall Street Support in the Strangest Places

 

In Vegas, Ron Paul visits The Phantom of the Opera

 

Rick Santorum:

 

The man behind Rick Santorum’s money: An interview with Foster Friess

 

Santorum "Tebows" with supporters

 

Santorum: Missouri isn't safe if Iran gets nukes

 

Santorum fails to qualify for Indiana ballot, vows to challenge the decision

 

Santorum on Komen reversal: 'Very disappointed'

 

Santorum targets Newt's Moon base

February 3, 2012 4:43pm ? Comments

   The Superbowl may be one of the most apolitical events of the year, but when it arrives in the middle of a highly-charged election like Indiana’s Senate GOP primary, somebody is bound to piggyback on it.

  Enter Republican Sen. Dick Lugar, the former mayor of Indianapolis, who’s so far successfully fighting off a Tea Party challenge. Not one to normally brag, we hear he is moving to take some credit for reviving the host city of Superbowl XLVI.

 

   In a letter to supporters, for example, he takes a little credit for pushing the city into the world-class category, though he was a senator when the Colts packed up and moved from Baltimore. And in a move that will have voters in the friendly Midwestern state nodding in appreciation, he also spreads the credit around to the local community.

 

   Elections expert Charlie Cook has the state staying in GOP hands, presumably with Lugar serving another term, but the state’s longest-serving senator is still in the battle for his life. And looking football friendly this weekend isn’t a chance to miss.

 

   Here is his letter to supporters:


Indiana's capital city has trained very hard for this moment. Super Bowl XLVI is one all Hoosiers should enjoy.

 

As mayor, I worked to make Indianapolis a world-class city. As Senator, I've kept my eye on the ball. But while officials often get credit for the rebirth and rebuilding of Greater Indianapolis, in reality, it has been a team effort of our citizens - citywide and statewide.

 

Hoosier Hospitality is not just a saying or slogan. The friendly, helpful nature of Indiana's people make our state an attractive destination for visitors and employers alike. Our work ethic and dogged determination bring events and investment marveled by other states, even nations.

 

Thanks go out to all Indiana hosts, volunteers and fans of Super Bowl XLVI. Your efforts symbolize true Hoosier Hospitality and have been vital for attracting and hosting this weekend's big game.

 

Congratulations, team!

 

Sincerely,

Richard G. Lugar

U.S. Senator for Indiana

February 3, 2012 4:40pm ? Comments
byPhilip Klein Senior Editorial Writer
Follow on Twitter:

Congressional Budget Office bean counters are taking a fresh look at President Obama’s national health care law, and will have updated figures on key provisions in March, director Doug Elmendorf testified this week in Congress.

Though he stopped short of saying there would be a full re-scoring of the law.

Several factors could make the health care law significantly more costly than advertised at the time of passage in March 2010. For instance, the law was crafted in a way to delay enactment of the major spending provisions until 2014, to make the legislation appear cheaper under the CBO’s 10-year budget window (then 2010 to 2019).  Now, the budget window has moved up to 2022, meaning it takes into account an extra three years of full enactment.

When Elmendorf testified before the House Budget Committee on Wednesday, Rep. John Campbell, R-Calif., asked him out the cost estimates for Medicaid spending and health insurance exchange subsidies would be effected now that CBO’s long-term unemployment forecast has deteriorated. Campbell noted that at the time of its original estimate, CBO was expecting an unemployment rate of 4.9 percent in 2014, but now that’s projected to be 8.7 percent.

“That piece alone would raise the cost of the Affordable Care Act,” Elmendorf said, referring to the formal name for the legislation. “I don’t know by how much.”

Elmendorf said the CBO would update its estimates of the cost of coverage expansions under the health care law.

On Thursday, Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis., also pressed Elmendorf on health care cost estimates, arguing that the number of employers who would be dumping workers on government-run exchanges and simply paying a fine would be higher than originally projected.

Elmendorf responded that in addition to updating the coverage provisions for March, the CBO was working on a separate analysis that would contain a range of estimates about how the cost of the health care law would be affected if certain assumptions were wrong one way or the other.

February 3, 2012 4:01pm ? Comments
byJoel Gehrke Commentary Staff Writer
Follow on Twitter:

Defense Secretary Leon Panetta refused to dispute or comment on a recent column reporting that he thinks Israel could attack Iran within the next few months.

"I'm not going to comment on that," Panetta replied when asked about a column in the Washington Post. "David Ignatius, you know, can write what he will but, you know, with regards to what I think and what I view, I consider that to be an area that belongs to me and nobody else."

Asked if he was "disputing" Ignatius' column, Panetta said "No, I'm just not commenting."

 

February 3, 2012 3:44pm ? Comments
byJoel Gehrke Commentary Staff Writer
Follow on Twitter:

Republican presidential candidate Rick Santorum told Missouri voters today that they will be in danger if Iran acquires nuclear weapons.

"Once they have a nuclear weapon, let me assure you, you will not be safe even here in Missouri," Santorum said. "These are folks who have been and are at war with us since 1979," he said of Iran.

Santorum recalled that the improvised explosive devices which are "the number one killer and maimer of our troops in the Middle East" were "manufactured in Iran, by the Iranian government, and distributed to the terrorists in both Iraq and Afghanistan."

H/T Andrew Kaczynski

February 3, 2012 3:25pm ? Comments
byCharlie Spiering Commentary Staff Writer
Follow on Twitter:

After it appeared that the Komen Foundation backed down from the decision to withdraw grants for Planned Parenthood, House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi and Sen. Barbara Boxer were quick to praise the decision.

"It just goes to show you when women speak out, women win." House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi said to reporters earlier today, "Women's health had a big victory this morning."

"Women's health triumphed over right-wing politics," Barbara Boxer exclaimed today, joining MSNBC's Andrea Mitchell on the phone this afternoon to celebrate the victory for Planned Parenthood

Yesterday, Boxer accused the organization of "McCarthy like" tactics, and suggested to Mitchell today that the explanation given by spokesman Nancy Brinker was "gobbledy - gook."

"There's almost hand to hand combat over the issue of birth control going on and I thought that was resolved in the '60s," Boxer added, "We have to make sure that the fact that women have access to birth control stands."

Boxer also panned the "terrible" bill proposed by Marco Rubio, that would repeal President Obama's contraception mandate.

 

February 3, 2012 3:11pm ? Comments
byMark Tapscott Editorial Page Editor

Remember President Obama's State of the Union speech last month, the one where he said, “we have a supply of natural gas that can last America nearly 100 years, and my administration will take every possible action to safely develop this energy,”

Well, it took Obama nine days to do the opposite of what he promised. Today, the Interior Department announced proposed new rules that add a layer of bureaucratic regulation to companies using hydraulic fracturing to develop natural gas and oil.

The proposed rules also remove millions of acres of public lands in Western states from energy exloration and production, thus preventing the nation from harvesting an estimated 1.5 trillion barrels of oil.

Institute for Energy Research (IER) offers a trenchant comment:

"The new rules appear to run counter to President Obama's recent State of the Union address, in which he pledged to "take every possible action" to increase production on public lands. The damaging effects that these new rules will have on job creation and robust domestic energy development cannot be overstated. 

"On the one hand, the administration wants to take credit for increased production on state and private lands and for offshore lease sales that were scheduled five years ago. On the other hand, the administration continues an ideologically-driven quest to stifle job creation in the energy sector and to raise the cost of energy through more regulation, more mandates, and more restrictions on affordable sources. At best, this administration is suffering from acute energy schizophrenia. At worst, the administration is using brute administrative force to hurt the oil and gas industries and reward its green energy cronies.

"It is hard to believe the administration's rhetoric about greater energy independence when its every action continues to lead America further away from that goal. And with record job creation now happening in the traditional energy sector, this latest tranche of regulations demonstrates just how willing the President is to kill the goose that's laying the golden egg."

For more on this and other energy related issues, go here.

February 3, 2012 2:59pm ? Comments
byConn Carroll Senior Editorial Writer
Follow on Twitter:

Yesterday, Sierra Club Executive Driector Michael Brune came clean about his organization's profitable relationship with the natural gas industry. Specifically, Brune admitted that his organization had taken $26 million from one of the country's largest natural gas companies, Chesapeake Energy, since 2007 to fund the Sierra Club's Beyond Coal campaign.

The investment for the natural gas industry is clear: use the Sierra Club as political cover to induce the federal government to drive up the cost of coal, thereby making natural gas relatively cheaper. It is classic Democratic corporatism in action.

But now that the natural gas industry's hydraulic fracturing practices have become the bete noir of the environmental movement, the Sierra Club wants a divorce. Brune writes:

It's time to stop thinking of natural gas as a "kinder, gentler" energy source. What's more, we do not have an effective regulatory system in this country to address the risks that gas drilling poses on our health and communities. The scope of the problems from under-regulated drilling, as well as a clearer understanding of the total carbon pollution that results from both drilling and burning gas, have made it plain that, as we phase out coal, we need to leapfrog over gas whenever possible in favor of truly clean energy. Instead of rushing to see how quickly we can extract natural gas, we should be focusing on how to be sure we are using less -- and safeguarding our health and environment in the meantime.

But will the Democratic Party follow suit? Here is then-Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., at the 2008 Democratic National Convention, defending her own personal investment in T. Boone Pickens energy firm (Pickens is also a big proponent of natural gas): "I’m investing in something I believe in. I believe in natural gas as a clean, cheap alternative to fossil fuel. … These investments in wind, in solar and biofuels and focus on natural gas, these are the real alternatives."

Does Pelosi still believe natural gas is a "clean cheap alternative to fossil fuel? Or has the "science" changed?

February 3, 2012 2:29pm ? Comments
byCharlie Spiering Commentary Staff Writer
Follow on Twitter:

At an event held at Stoney's Country Bar in Las Vegas today, Newt Gingrich criticized Mitt Romney for being a candidate approved by George Soros.

"I do not believe that the Republican party wants to nominate a George Sores approved candidate, I think we want a candidate who represents Americans who work pay taxes and believe in the Declaration of Independence, not someone who is clearly against the American ideal." Gingrich declared.

Referring to his new ad, Gingrich reminded the audience that liberal billionaire George Soros suggested to a European news outlet that there wasn't much difference between Mitt Romney and Barack Obama.

"It isn't good enough for the Republican party to nominate Obama-lite," said Gingrich.

Gingrich hit Romney for his comments about the poor, calling it a "little boo-boo."

A "genuine conservative," Gingrich added, wouldn't say that he "didn't care about the poor."

"Not a very clever thing for someone who is very wealthy to say." Gingrich said.

February 3, 2012 2:06pm ? Comments
byJoel Gehrke Commentary Staff Writer
Follow on Twitter:

Attorney General Eric Holder called for Louisianans to fight racism in their communities, noting that voting rights discrimination is "all too common" in the United States.

"Unfortunately, in jurisdictions across the country, both overt and subtle forms of discrimination remain all too common," Holder said today at Tulane University in Louisiana.  "And we don’t have to look far to see recent proof." Holder reminded his audience of a recent redistricting case in which a Louisiana parish "map-drawer began the process by meeting exclusively with white officeholders," which Holder said produced a map that "diminished the electoral opportunity for African Amerians."

The Justice Department "objected" to that map, Holder said, and so "the Parish enacted a new, non-discriminatory map."

Holder called for Americans to support him in fighting voting discrimination. "For every citizen, protecting the right to vote, ensuring meaningful access, and combating discrimination must be viewed, not only as a legal issue – but as a moral imperative," he said.  "And every citizen, in every state, must be part of this work." 

February 3, 2012 1:22pm ? Comments

The public might love former President Ronald Reagan, but the nation’s college professors don’t, putting Presidents Obama and Clinton above him on their list of best presidents.

According to a new poll taken on the eve of the Gipper’s 101st birthday February 6, 60 percent of the nation’s elite educators didn’t even put Reagan on their top 10 list.

In the poll done for Young America’s Foundation, which owns the Reagan Ranch in California,  284 professors from a mix of schools including Johns Hopkins University, Duke, Harvard and Texas A & M, gave Reagan a middling grade of C. Obama received a C+, Clinton a B, Jimmy Carter C-, George H.W. Bush C, and his son George W. Bush D.

Liberal leaning college professors have long ‘dissed Reagan, but the survey from The Polling Company found that 61 percent believe Reagan’s presidency was a success.

“The leftist tilt of college professors is well known. However, the fact that President Reagan is now viewed as successful by 61 percent of this group is a testament to the lasting accomplishments of our 40th president,” said Frank Donatelli, chairman of the Reagan Ranch board of governors.

Like the public, the professors put Lincoln, FDR and George Washington at the top of their list. But just 13 percent believe Reagan belongs in the top three. A recent Gallup poll found the the public believed Reagan wat the greatest president in history.

Pollster Kellyanne Conway also asked about Obama in the college poll and 59 percent deemed his presidency a success.

As for the professors, 57 percent self-identified as liberals; 16 percent as conservatives.